|
What is a JPod?
A JPod is a small, efficient, safe, computer driven
vehicle for transporting people and cargo. An empty JPod for
moving people typically weighs about 450 pounds (205
kilograms). A JPod runs suspended from an overhead rail.
Are there different types of JPods?
Yes. There are several types. People JPods
carry people and their shopping bags or luggage. Gurney JPods are
larger and are mobile ambulances that carry medical support equipment
and a caregiver with a patient. Trash JPods carry waste.
Cargo JPods carry a standard pallet. Other specialty JPods can be
summoned to transport wheelchairs and bicycles and their riders.
How do JPods perform in various weather
conditions?
The JPod system is designed to endure the worst extremes
of weather. The vehicle is suspended below the rail with its
drive mechanism enclosed above inside the overhead rail, protecting it
from rain and snow. JPods are designed to operate between the -58
to 122 Fahrenheit ( +/- 50 centigrade) in 45 mph (72 kph) sustained
winds with snow loads of 50 pounds per square foot (194 kg/square
meter). In higher winds vehicle travel is suspended. The
rails and supports are designed to withstand 90 mph (145 kph) sustained
winds with snow loads of 50 pounds per square foot (194 kg/square
meter).
How fast do JPods travel?
30-40 miles per hour / 48-64 kilometers per hour
Can JPods go up hills?
Yes, JPods can climb grades of 3% without reducing
speed. Steeper grades require the JPod to slow down to limit
power consumption.
Who actually operates JPods?
Local Mobility Companies (LMCs) purchase the rights to
operate JPods technology in a given area. LMCs are privately
owned or public-private partnerships. LMCs work with all
different types of community members; elected officials, the media,
neighborhood groups, local government, and private capital, to receive
the necessary approval to build and operate a JPods network.
Are any JPods up and running now?
No. JPods, Inc. has signed letters of interest from The
Water Park of America (Bloomington, MN), the City of Richfield, MN and
The Mall of America (Bloomington, MN). JPods, Inc. will be
announcing new letters of interest shortly. JPods, Inc. is
currently in negotiations with various venture capital firms that will
lead to increasing opportunities to begin construction.
What is the economic and societal impact if
JPods and personal rapid transit (PRT) is built?
This will create new industries; complementing existing
“green” infrastructure. JPods can operate on solar power
and save a pound of CO2 per passenger mile automated.
The transition will create new companies, new job
skills, and educational growth. An array of positive economic
opportunities will reduce current traffic congestion, pollution and
foreign oil dependence. We recommend that funds currently
allocated to Light Rail Transit (LRT) not be spent on LRT. We
believe these funds are better used to reinforce the growth of
sustainable industry, jobs, educational and economic opportunities
associated with personal rapid transit (PRT).
Many cities are considering Light Rail Transit
(LRT) or already have LRT. How does JPods and Personal Rapid
Transit (PRT) compare?
The City of Ottawa, Canada is currently planning to
build 31 km of light rail. For about the same capital investment,
JPods, Inc. can create a network of about 200 km of interconnected
lines. The increased mobility and ease of construction contrasted
to LRT is dramatic. LRT normally requires subsidies to sustain
operation while JPods makes money and can add to a city’s budget.
Further, JPods operates at a profit attractive enough to attract
private capital. Government money is not required to build JPod
systems.
How many people will the JPod seat?
A JPod will seat 1-4 people and and/or room for
groceries and small items. Some will have room for two bicycles.
Can units of government buy into a LMC? Does it
just have to be privately owned?
Yes. There is no limit to how a LMC will be organized.
By owning a portion of a LMC local units of government help
provide part of the financing, and create a reliable stream of income
for city and/or county coffers. The formation of public/private
companies is encouraged.
Won’t JPods and their rails be ugly and
unsightly?
Think about the existing infrastructure. Telephone
poles, light poles, power lines and stop lights abound. They are
so common, they are ubiquitous; they are ugly. A JPod network
will normally be rails suspended from poles like a suspension bridge,
gracefully looping along its path. We think this will be pleasing
to most people. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
Will there be cameras installed inside the pod?
If so, why?
Yes. Two cameras will be inside the JPod; one
facing forward and one facing backward. Cameras are needed to
document any inappropriate activity to permit billing of repair costs
and provide evidence of criminal behavior. Each JPod has an
emergency touch point that will alarm and draw attention from the
central monitoring personnel. Cameras help keep people safe.
What about light poles, stop lights, telephone
lines, and power lines? Won’t they cause problems with setting up
a JPods PRT line?
Where permitted by ordinance, the poles that are used to
support the JPods can also be used as light poles, or stop lights, or
as supports for telephone and data lines. It is not safe to
support power lines above the JPods rails.
Does JPods Inc. envision a time when there will
be no cars?
No, cars have a purpose. Although inefficient,
cars are well suited for long distance travel and going to irregular
destinations. Once a sufficient size local network is fully
built, JPods, Inc. envisions people buying fewer cars; families avoid
buying a second or third car for teenagers.
Are there any special rights of ways or special
permitting that needs to take place to build a JPods network?
Yes and No. LMCs will go through the normal city /
county review process for permits for construction. Where a local
government puts excessive restrictions or makes it too onerous to
build, the LMC may have to enlist public support and pressure to
resolve the political constraints. Initially, JPods, Inc. will
build where we are wanted and the roadblocks do not exist.
How much weight can a pod support?
The load capacity depends upon the type of
vehicle. A standard people JPod can carry 4 people with a
generous margin on normal weight. We have made provisions to
supply typical bus seat space for each person. A very obese
person will prevent a second person from sharing that side of the JPod.
People arrive at, and JPods are stored at,
stations. How big are these stations and what kind of footprint do they
have?
Initially, each location will probably require a custom
design. Once several JPod systems are built, the common elements
will be standardized. JPod stations will be much smaller
than train stations for equivalent throughput. An individual
loading area should be no bigger than a typical covered bus stop, about
10 feet by 8 feet (3 m x 2.4 m). A four JPod loading area station
can surpass a LRT station in rider capacity.
How high off the ground does a JPod operate?
Where the JPods cross streets and highways, the bottom
of the JPod is above the height of a tractor trailer so there is no
possibility of collision with ground traffic. Where JPods
will not interfere with ground vehicular traffic, they may be lower,
but still above pedestrian traffic.
Who will physically build the J-Pods?
Construction will be performed under contracts to the
LMCs. JPods, Inc. will ensure all construction is according to
JPods, Inc. quality standards or the system will not permitted to
operate.
Will there be fans inside or will the windows
open to keep people cool? Will there be electric heat to keep
people warm?
Each JPod intended to carry people will have its own
heat pump and ventilation unit, similar to the small units used in
hotel rooms. It will automatically provide cooling or heating and
fresh air to maintain comfort.
At what point does owning Local Mobility Company
become profitable?
Each JPod network is a distinct operating entity.
We believe that many properly managed LMCs have the potential to pay
for themselves in three or four years and show pre-tax profit in the
range of 30% and higher.
What kind of power will JPods run on? 110 AC?
The JPod system supplies power to the JPod vehicles via
power conductor cables supported from the rail support structure.
These cables are totally enclosed by electrical insulation and can be
touched without harm. The voltage inside these cables is at a
high frequency; 20 thousand cycles per second. The JPod vehicles
receive power by the process of magnetic induction through pickup units
that run about ¼” (6 mm) from the conductor cables.
All of this equipment is weatherproof. The power pickup unit and
power converters within the JPod electronics produce voltages as needed
for the DC motors and computer.
What happens if a JPod motor fails?
Each JPod has two drive bogies in the overhead
rail. Each bogie is driven by its own DC motor. Each motor
has sufficient capacity to drive the JPod to its destination. A
motor failure will not be noticed by a passenger. After
unloading, the JPod will not accept new passengers and will drive
itself to the maintenance area.
What will the pod be constructed from?
JPods will be built from lightweight, strong materials;
aluminum and rigid composite fabrics.
Are the JPods wheelchair accessible?
Special wheelchair accessible JPods will be in the
system and can be summoned when needed.
http://www.jpods.com/JPods/003LastOilCrisis/7503_LastOilCrisis.pdf
| Government Studies
|
| Last Oil Crisis, 1975 |
|
At Senatorial request, DOT defined PRT as a
likely solution to oil addiction. It also noted the likely reasons it
would not be adopted which had to do with lack of will to implement
simple solutions.
|
| 060322_EUStudy.pdf |
|
Definitive study by the European Union that
concludes RPT is the solution that can attract drivers from their cars
into mass transit.
|
| InnovPTS2_Swedish.pdf |
|
Swedish study of PRT and its importance to
replace auto trips.
|
| CSTWinnipegGilbert_0604.pdf |
|
Canadian Sustainable Infrastructure study of
energy sources and PRT.
|
| edict_brochure.pdf |
|
European Union Summary of Study for PRT in
several cities.
|
| directory_fp5_cot_projects_en.pdf |
|
European Union extensive scientific approach to
designing cities of the future. |
| Implementations
|
| morgantown_TRB_111504.pdf |
|
Morgantown, WV has been operating an oversized,
hybrid of Group and Personal Rapid Transit since 1975. They logged 100
million injury free passenger miles.
|
| hagenstudyCabinetTaxi.pdf |
|
German PRT project
|
| Wupertal
|
|
Because of its suspended design, the Schwebenbahn
is one of the safest transportation systems in the world. Having
carried more than 1.5 billion passengers it has had only one fatal
accident at the cost of 5 lives. That is radically different than the
40,000 deaths per year from cars in the US.
|
| Industry and
Academic Studies
|
| prt_Campus_Schneider.pdf |
|
Study of campus solution with PRT.
|
| EPA
sponsored Studies |
|
Study of specific implementations by Steve Raney.
Very well defined method of determining benefits
|
| SolarEvolution |
|
Solar energy company presentation on the synergy
between low mass transit and solar energy.
|
| Princeton University |
|
Excellent study of how a network the size of New
Jersey can be broken into implementations by economic community.
|
| prt_Campus_Schneider.pdf |
|
Study of campus solution with PRT.
|
| Prt_Italian.pdf |
|
Italian PRT study.
|
| PRTinitiative_TRB_4web.pdf |
|
PRT study presented at the TRB.
|
| FutureofHCPRT-Jan606.doc |
|
Dr. Ed Anderson's 2005 paper on PRT. Ed is a
leading pioneer and carried the torch for many years.
|
| infrastructure_cost_ASCE.doc |
|
Cost comparison of various infrastructure
alternatives.
|
| LeanManufacturingTransit.pdf |
|
Just-in-Time productivity gains benefited
manufacturers shift from Mass Production. The same focus on quality
applies to productivity opportunities in Mass Transportation.
|
| T2K-Rebuttal-to-CALS.pdf |
|
Taxi 2000 response to not being selected as the
vendor for Cincinnati's people mover.
|
| Ultra_case_studies.pdf |
|
Ultra's case studies of various PRT opportunities
|
| Ultra_clean_air_paper.pdf |
|
Ultra's clean air study.
|
| Ultra_Econ_assessments.doc |
|
Ultra's Economic Assessment
|
| CascadiaHitchhikePaper.doc |
|
PRT study of the Microsoft Campus area.
|
| CaseForPRT.pdf |
|
Study on why PRT is important.
|
| CostPerMileOperations_UWa.pdf |
|
Study of Cost per Mile of various rail systems.
|
| emery_genl_plan.ppt |
|
Powerpoint using Emeryville, CA as an example of
the benefits of PRT. Presentation by Steve Raney of Cities21.org.
|
| Industry Sites
|
| Advance Transit |
|
Organization which promotes the PRT industry.
|
| Innovative
Transportation |
|
University of Washington, Innovative
Transportation Technologies site.
|
| Get There Board |
|
Advocacy site
|
| Citizens
for PRT |
|
Advocacy site
|
| Austin
Citizens for PRT |
|
Advocacy site
|
| Manufacturer's
Sites
|
| Skyweb |
|
Minnesota based PRT system.
|
| ULTra |
|
British PRT System
|
| Coaster |
|
Swiss PRT System
|
| Vectus |
|
Korean/Swedish collaboration to build PRT
systems. Well funded by mult-billion dollar Korean steel company.
|
| SkyTran |
|
MegLev PRT system.
|
| Mister |
|
Polish suspended system.
|
| MagLev |
|
MagneMotion meglev company.
|
| Macro Reports on
Consequences
|
| IPCC |
|
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
(IPCC) has been established by WMO and UNEP to assess scientific,
technical and socio- economic information relevant for the
understanding of climate change, its potential impacts and options for
adaptation and mitigation.
|
| Stern Review |
|
British Treasury Report on immediate need to
invest 1% of world GDP to mitigate 20% collapse of world GDP from
Global Warming.
|
| ABC
Webcast of Peak Oil |
|
Very well done presentation on the details behind
Peak Oil.
|
| World Economic Forum, 2007 |
|
List of economic risks and probabilities.
|
| Washington State Climate Change Consequences |
|
Very well done presentation on the details behind
Peak Oil.
|
| California Climate Warning |
|
Climate change impact on California.
|
| Regulatory
Breakthrough
|
| freight_Public_Private.htm |
|
California Laws review for public investment in
private rail.
|
| Background details
on automobiles and trip replacement
|
| pub_heavy_load_10_06.pdf |
|
Heavy burden on families, housing and
transportation. Study underscores that transportation is a very heavy
burden on lower income working families.
|
| RealPriceGasoline1998.pdf |
|
Real cost of gasoline. |
| AutoGHG_0608.pdf |
|
Automobiles and Green House Gases
|
| GasPerDay_pmmtab48.pdf |
|
Gas usage per day by State
|
| motor_gas_ass.pdf |
|
DOE assessment of mechanics of gas prices
increases in 1996 and 1997.
|
| CostsperMileRoads2005.pdf |
|
Cost per mile for roads.
|
|